Jonathan Bates, a former British serviceman and school employee, was sentenced to five years in prison at Truro Crown Court on January 2, 2025, after admitting to stalking four women and an offence involving private sexual images. Between 2017 and 2022, he used manipulated photographs, fake pornography profiles and victims' personal information to harass women, including his former wife and former colleague Kirsty Pellant. In October 2026, Pellant renewed calls for stronger victim protection after learning that Bates was eligible for early release, while fraudulent sexual images and profiles continued to affect her life.
Who Is Jonathan Bates?
Jonathan Bates was 54 years old when he was sentenced in January 2025. A former British military serviceman who later worked in education, he had professional and personal connections to several of the women he targeted.
His offending involved creating false online identities using photographs taken from social media, manipulating those images and publishing personal details on pornography and adult-services websites.
Investigators found that Bates had maintained an extensive collection of photographs and information about women, demonstrating that the harassment was sustained and deliberate.
How Jonathan Bates Used Fake Sexual Images to Stalk Women
Between 2017 and 2022, Bates targeted four women through a campaign of online impersonation and sexual-image abuse.
He obtained photographs from social media accounts and digitally altered them to suggest that the women had posed nude or participated in sexual activities. Some images involved placing victims' faces onto photographs of other women's bodies.
Bates then published the manipulated content through fake profiles on pornography, dating and adult-services websites. Some advertisements falsely suggested that the women were offering sexual services.
The profiles contained identifying information, including names, locations and workplace details. This increased the likelihood that strangers would contact the victims or recognize them outside the internet.
The court heard that the abuse caused serious psychological distress, damaged professional reputations and left victims fearful for their safety.
Kirsty Pellant's Experience of Deepfake Abuse
Kirsty Pellant, a former school safeguarding worker, was one of Bates' four victims. She discovered that photographs taken from her Facebook account had been used to create explicit images and fraudulent online advertisements.
Some profiles combined manipulated sexual images with genuine photographs and identifying information, making the impersonation appear convincing to strangers.
The consequences extended into Pellant's everyday life. Men contacted her believing the advertisements were genuine, and some arrived at her home. She also faced hostility from people who believed the fabricated material reflected her actual activities.
The harassment affected her employment, personal relationships and mental health. Pellant eventually left her career in education and continued receiving unwanted messages long after the offending had been exposed.
In later interviews, she described the difficulty of proving that apparently realistic images were fabricated, particularly when they circulated alongside authentic personal information.
How the Victims Identified Jonathan Bates
For years, the person responsible for the false profiles remained unidentified. Bates reportedly used techniques intended to conceal his online activity, complicating the investigation.
A breakthrough came when affected women began comparing their experiences and examining connections within their social media networks.
In 2022, the victims identified Bates as a common connection and provided information that helped investigators focus on him.
A subsequent search uncovered nine USB storage devices containing photographs and personal information relating to numerous women.
The discovery supported the prosecution's case that Bates had engaged in systematic online stalking rather than isolated incidents of image manipulation.
Jonathan Bates' Ex-Wife Was Also Targeted
Bates' former wife was among the four women subjected to his offending.
The case demonstrated how image-based sexual abuse can involve both publicly accessible photographs and private material obtained through personal relationships.
For victims who previously trusted the offender, discovering that personal images had been misused added another dimension to the psychological harm.
The prosecution treated the conduct as part of a wider pattern of harassment involving multiple women over several years.
What Crimes Did Jonathan Bates Admit?
At Truro Crown Court, Bates admitted four counts of stalking involving serious alarm or distress, covering offences committed between 2017 and 2022.
He also pleaded guilty to disclosing or threatening to disclose private sexual photographs and films with intent to cause distress to one woman between August and November 2021.
On January 2, 2025, Judge Simon Carr sentenced Bates to five years in prison and imposed a ten-year restraining order protecting the victims.
The judge described the offending as exceptionally serious because of its calculated nature and the lasting harm inflicted on the women.
Although the case was widely reported as a deepfake pornography scandal, the convictions concerned stalking and unlawful sexual-image disclosure. Bates was not sentenced under a standalone offence of creating AI-generated sexual deepfakes.
What Happened to Kirsty Pellant After the Conviction?
Bates' imprisonment did not eliminate the harmful material already circulating online.
Pellant continued discovering fraudulent profiles, manipulated images and advertisements using her identity. She reported that strangers still contacted her and that removing the material had become a persistent burden.
In an interview published on October 6, 2026, Pellant said she was removing as many as 112 fake images a day from websites.
The repeated appearance of the material demonstrated how copies of manipulated images can remain accessible even after criminal proceedings have ended.
Pellant also began advocating stronger recognition of reputational abuse, arguing that existing legal protections did not fully address the harm caused by fake profiles and sexualized impersonation.
Jonathan Bates' Early Release Controversy in 2026
In September and October 2026, the case returned to national attention after Pellant learned that Bates could be released early under government measures intended to reduce prison overcrowding.
She said she had received notification about his eligibility but insufficient information about his rehabilitation, risk assessment and the safeguards that would apply following his release.
Reports discussed an expected October 2026 release, while other accounts described uncertainty about the exact date.
As of November 10, 2026, the public reporting reviewed for this article does not independently establish whether Bates has actually been released.
Pellant expressed concern that advances in image-manipulation technology could make further offending easier if adequate supervision and preventative measures were not imposed.
A UK government spokesperson condemned Bates' actions and stated that release from prison would not remove the restrictions and supervision imposed on offenders. Officials also highlighted the use of licence conditions, geographical restrictions and other protective measures.
UK Laws on Non-Consensual Deepfake Pornography
The Bates case attracted attention during a period of legal reform concerning intimate-image abuse in England and Wales.
Legislation introduced through the Online Safety Act 2023 strengthened criminal protections against sharing intimate images without consent, including certain digitally altered material.
On January 7, 2025, the UK government announced plans for a further criminal offence targeting the creation of sexually explicit deepfake images without consent.
The proposed reform addressed a distinction between creating fabricated sexual images and distributing or threatening to distribute them.
Stalking, impersonation, unauthorized disclosure and the creation of manipulated sexual content can involve different legal provisions. The applicable offences depend on the conduct, available evidence and legislation in force at the relevant time.
The Bates prosecution illustrates how digital sexual abuse can form part of a broader course of stalking that causes substantial harm beyond the images themselves.
Why the Effects of Deepfake Abuse Can Continue for Years
Non-consensual sexual images can damage a person's reputation and sense of safety even when the depicted activity never occurred.
Once material is copied across multiple websites, removing the original upload may not prevent further circulation. Victims can be forced to repeatedly identify and report new copies.
When fabricated images are accompanied by genuine names, workplaces or contact information, online harassment can also lead to unwanted in-person encounters.
Pellant's experience illustrates these long-term consequences. Although Bates was convicted in 2025, the false material continued affecting her in 2026.
Jonathan Bates Case Timeline
- 2017–2022: Bates stalks four women using manipulated photographs, fake sexual profiles and personal information.
- 2022: Victims compare their experiences and identify Bates as a common connection, contributing to the investigation.
- January 2, 2025: Bates receives a five-year prison sentence at Truro Crown Court and a ten-year restraining order.
- January 7, 2025: The UK government announces further measures targeting the creation of non-consensual sexual deepfakes.
- September–October 2026: Pellant raises concerns about Bates' potential early release and inadequate information about victim protection.
- October 6, 2026: Pellant reports that fraudulent sexual images and profiles continue circulating online.
- November 2026: Bates' actual release status remains unconfirmed in the public sources reviewed.
Latest Case Status
Jonathan Bates' five-year prison sentence and ten-year restraining order remain the established legal outcomes of the case. His reported eligibility for early release became a new source of anxiety for Kirsty Pellant in 2026, although his actual release status requires confirmation.
For the victims, the consequences have continued beyond the courtroom. The persistence of manipulated sexual images, false profiles and unwanted contact has raised questions about how effectively existing laws, online platforms and offender-supervision systems protect people subjected to sustained digital abuse.
The case illustrates that the damage caused by online stalking and non-consensual sexual imagery can continue long after the person responsible has been identified and convicted.
- Log in to post comments